X 射线照相缺陷定位方法分析与验证
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

航天材料及工艺研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis and Verification of Locating Defects in X-ray Photographic Testing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    相对于公式法,双标记法解决了焦距和焦点位移测量误差所带来的问题。但此方法在射线检测
    领域普及程度并不高,其中原因,首先是原理较复杂,针对性研究少,其次是测量精度没有被量化,可信度不高。
    本文从公式法入手,通过对原理公式的变化分析和线性化分析,明晰了双标记法缺陷深度定位原理,推导了缺
    陷深度定位公式,利用简化模型,对双标记法的定位精度做了进一步的分析与计算,最后针对具体被检测物,测
    试验证了双标记法的计算公式和测量精度,用理论和实践证明了方法和精度的可靠性。

    Abstract:

    Formula method and double labeling method are two positioning methods on depth of defects. Relative
    to the formula method,the double labeling method solves the problems brought by the measurement error of focal
    length and focus shift by method of double labeling. This is a method of greater practical significance. Meanwhile,
    this method is not wildly used in the field of ray inspection. The first reason is the principles are complicated, and targeted
    researches are less; the second reason is, the measurement accuracy cannot be quantified, the credibility is dubious.
    Formula method is used in this essay. Through the analysis on change and linearization of principle formula,
    the essay defines the position principle on defect depth of double labeling method, derives the position formulation of
    defect depth. Using the reduced model, the essay do further analysis and calculation on position accuracy of double
    labeling method. Finally, according to the specific article to be detected, the test verified the calculation formula and
    the measurement accuracy, certified the reliability on method and accuracy from the point of theory and practice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

蔡闰生. X 射线照相缺陷定位方法分析与验证[J].宇航材料工艺,2013,43(3).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-11-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码